MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405437295 · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02552

Design, Synthesis, and Biochemical Evaluation of Novel MLK3 Inhibitors: A Target Hopping Example

2024· article· en· W4405437295 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pascal Sander, Martin P. Schwalm, Andreas Krämer, Lewis Elson, Alexander Rasch, Benedikt Masberg, Roland Selig, Adrian Sievers‐Engler, Michael Lämmerhofer, Susanne Müller, Stefan Knapp, Wolfgang Albrecht, Stefan Laufer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStructural Genomics ConsortiumDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsKinomeDruggabilityChemistryKinaseComputational biologyFocal adhesionLineage (genetic)MAP kinase kinase kinaseProtein kinase ACell biologySignal transductionBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human kinome has tremendous medical potential. In the past decade, mixed-lineage protein kinase 3 (MLK3) has emerged as an interesting and druggable target in oncogenic signaling. The important role of MLK3 has been demonstrated in several types of cancer. In a target hopping example we started with the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor PF-431396 ( 10 ), which shows off-target activity toward MLK3. We were able to develop highly active compounds in the single digit nanomolar range for MLK3. Furthermore, we achieved a dramatic shift in selectivity from FAK to MLK3. Here we present a new chemical class of MLK3 inhibitors, including our lead compound 37 with an outstanding IC 50 value of <1 nM in a biochemical MLK3 assay while simultaneously exhibiting kinome-wide selectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207