MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405443639 · doi:10.55905/cuadv16n12-167

Avaliação por ressonância magnética da placenta prévia e placenta acreta: uma revisão de literatura

2024· article· pt· W4405443639 on OpenAlexaff
Daniella Coelho Vandanezi Sobreira, Gustavo Bittencourt Camilo

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlacentaGynecologyMedicineFetusPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A placenta acreta (PA) é a fixação anormal da placenta na parede uterina, frequentemente associada à placenta prévia (PP). A ocorrência de PP e PA aumenta a morbimortalidade materna devido aos intensos sangramentos durante o parto. O diagnóstico é desafiador e depende da história clínica e exames de imagem. Embora a ultrassonografia (US) seja o exame inicial, a ressonância magnética (RM) é mais precisa, pois possibilita a avaliação da invasão placentária e a identificação de aderências.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos de Educación y DesarrolloSame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207