Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article focuses on the sporting event known as the Arctic Winter Games, which features young people (aged ten to twenty) from the Arctic regions, provinces, and nations. It demonstrates that young participants primarily experience this event as festive, thus fulfilling the Games’ stated promise of combining sports with the promotion of Arctic culture. Drawing on data collected during the 2023 edition, the article investigates the expectations of both the young athletes and the organizers and then compares them with how participants experience the event. The behaviors, interactions, and relationships that develop during flagship Games events, such as Arctic sports and Dene games, during which festive practices take center stage, are also part of this study. The article thus illustrates that the Arctic Winter Games place festivity, primarily as a means for participants to socialize and foster a symbolic unity among young people of the North, at the heart of the event. The festive and partying moments, which are integral to this youth-focused event, make the Arctic Winter Games an unique platform to observe how international sports events are striving today to renew their model by constructing a strong social and cultural sense of belonging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".