MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405445645 · doi:10.32718/nvlvet-a10132

Motivation of milking high productivity cows under the conditions of robotic sys-tems

2024· article· en· W4405445645 on OpenAlex
M. M. Lutsenko, Ольга Брусиловська

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Biological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMilkingAnimal scienceProductivityAutomatic milkingChemistryBiologyEconomicsLactation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scientific research was carried out at the TDV “Terezine” farm of Bila Tserkva district, Kyiv region, on a newly created dairy farm for 500 cows with robotic milking systems of the De Laval Company. The herd of cows has been housed in a room with new volume-planning and technological solutions of 36 m wide and 10.5 m high. In the center of the room are eight robotic systems where the animals enter for milking at their request. The article highlights the research results into the structure of the milking herd of a dairy farm. It has been established that at the farm with robotic milking systems for 500 cows, there are animals with 1–6 lactations. The most significant part of the herd consists of cows of the first lactation (142 heads) and the smallest one - of the sixth lactation (11 heads). The parts of cows of the third, fourth, and fifth lactation are, respectively, 3rd – heads, 4th – 45 heads, and 5th – 28 heads. Such a structure of the herd indicates that the cows are highly productive. We studied the milking frequency of cows of different ages under robotic milking depending on the lactation period and their productivity. It has been shown that the technology of milking cows using robotic milking systems radically differs from that of milking on traditional machines. It was found that first-born cows had the lowest number of milking times per lactation (2.17 times), and cows of the second lactation had the highest (2.24 times) with a gradual decrease in the third (2.21 times) and the fourth (2.18 times). The decrease in the frequency of milking in the third and fourth lactation is because as the age of lactating cows increases, milk productivity increases, and, accordingly, the size of the udder, which does not require frequent release. Studies have proven that the higher the daily milk yield, the more often the cow comes to be milked. So, the first-born cows with an average daily milk yield of 10–20 kg go to milking 2.12 times, and with a productivity of 20–30 kg, the number of milking increases by 0.1 time, and with daily milk yields of 31–40 kg and 41–50 kg, the need in milking increases by 0.35 and 0.43 times. It has also been established that the need for milking is 0.52 times higher in animals of second lactation than in first-born cows. It has also been established that when the daily productivity of cows increases, the intervals between milking are shortened. With a daily milking of 10–20 kg, the average interval between milking is 10.5 hours, and with a milking of 40 kg and above – 7.3 hours. The most extended interval between milking is observed at night between the evening and morning milking. Based on the obtained research results, the farm's work schedule is suggested to be adjusted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it