Signatures of chronic pain in multiple sclerosis: a machine learning approach to investigate trigeminal neuralgia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Chronic pain is a pervasive, disabling, and understudied feature of multiple sclerosis (MS), a progressive demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease. Current focus on motor components of MS disability combined with difficulties assessing pain symptoms present a challenge for the evaluation and management of pain in MS, highlighting the need for novel methods of assessment of neural signatures of chronic pain in MS. We investigate chronic pain in MS using MS-related trigeminal neuralgia (MS-TN) as a model condition focusing on gray matter structures as predictors of chronic pain. T1 imaging data from people with MS (n = 75) and MS-TN (n = 77) using machine learning (ML) was analyzed to derive imaging predictors at the level of cortex and subcortical gray matter. The ML classifier compared imaging metrics of patients with MS and MS-TN and distinguished between these conditions with 93.4% individual average testing accuracy. Structures within default-mode, somatomotor, salience, and visual networks (including hippocampus, primary somatosensory cortex, occipital cortex, and thalamic subnuclei) were identified as significant imaging predictors of trigeminal neuralgia pain. Our results emphasize the multifaceted nature of chronic pain and demonstrate the utility of imaging and ML in assessing and understanding MS-TN with greater objectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".