MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Posterior-superior insula repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces experimental tonic pain and pain-related cortical inhibition in humans

2024· article· en· W4405447173 on OpenAlexaff
Nahian Chowdhury, Samantha K. Millard, Enrico De Martino, Dennis Boye Larsen, David A. Seminowicz, Siobhan M. Schabrun, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Thomas Graven‐Nielsen

Bibliographic record

VenuePain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsParkwood InstituteWestern University
FundersNovo Nordisk FondenNovo NordiskDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNational Research Foundation
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationTonic (physiology)AnalgesicMedicineAnesthesiaInsulaStimulationForearmPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeuroscienceInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the posterior-superior insula (PSI) may produce analgesic effects. However, the alterations in cortical activity during PSI-rTMS analgesia remain poorly understood. The present study aimed to determine whether tonic capsaicin-induced pain and cortical inhibition (indexed using TMS-electroencephalography) are modulated by PSI-rTMS. Twenty healthy volunteers (10 females) attended 2 sessions randomized to active or sham rTMS. Experimental pain was induced by capsaicin administered to the forearm for 90 minutes, with pain ratings collected every 5 minutes. Left PSI-rTMS was delivered (10 Hz, 100 pulses per train, 15 trains) ∼50 minutes postcapsaicin administration. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potentials (TEPs) and thermal sensitivity were assessed at baseline, during capsaicin pain prior to rTMS and after rTMS. Bayesian evidence of reduced pain scores and increased heat pain thresholds were found after active rTMS, with no changes occurring after sham rTMS. Pain (prior to active rTMS) led to an increase in the frontal negative peak ∼45 ms (N45) TEP relative to baseline. After active rTMS, there was a decrease in the N45 peak back to baseline levels. In contrast, after sham rTMS, the N45 peak was increased relative to baseline. We also found that the reduction in pain numerical rating scale scores after active vs sham rTMS was correlated with and partially mediated by decreases in the N45 peak. These findings provide evidence of the analgesic effects of PSI-rTMS and suggest that the TEP N45 peak is a potential marker and mediator of both pain and analgesia. This study demonstrates that high-frequency rTMS targeting the posterior-superior insula reduces capsaicin-induced pain and alters cortical activity, with changes in the N45 TMS-evoked potential peak mediating the analgesic effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePainSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207