Make it real with gen Z! The impact AR reality congruence on brand information sharing: Exploring a sequential mediation mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) has garnered considerable interest for its potential to motivate engagement and advance customer-brand interactions. This study explored the impact of reality congruence (RC) of AR-menus on brand information sharing (BIS) in fast-food restaurants, particularly among Generation Z (Gen Z), as well as the mediating effects of usefulness of AR menu (UAR) and brand positivity (BP) on this relationship. Media Richness Theory (MRT) was employed as the theoretical umbrella for developing the study model. To validate the research model, we employed structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with a sample of 209 respondents. The results demonstrate that reality congruence of AR menus is a relevant predictor of Gen Z members’ behavior in sharing information about the brand. Furthermore, this relationship was mediated by the UAR and BP. The findings also demonstrated that UAR and BP had a sequential mediating effect on the relationship between the RC of AR-menu and BIS. This revolutionary study revealed that RC of AR-menu in restaurants fosters positive behaviors in fast food settings. By highlighting AR's potential to create engaging dining experiences for Gen Z members, this study offers valuable insights for service businesses, marketing managers, and the hospitality industry. Addressing this gap in existing research emphasizes the importance of adopting innovative technologies to enhance Gen Z's customer experience and engagement in the restaurant industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".