Analysis of eco-friendly business practices and their impact on environmental sustainability in a Peruvian Amazon region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eco-friendly business practices range from energy efficiency to sustainable management; therefore, the implementation of these practices not only has the potential to mitigate environmental impacts, but also to improve the long-term competitiveness and sustainability of companies. In this study we analyze eco-friendly business practices and their impact on environmental sustainability in companies in a region of the Peruvian Amazon. A quantitative, non-experimental approach was considered, with an explanatory design; for which, a sample size of 200 companies was considered, which were randomly selected, to which two instruments were applied, the first with 7 indicators and the second with 3, valid, with an alpha of 0.720 and 0.670 respectively, assessing structural equation modeling. The results show that eco-friendly business practices are oriented towards sustainability (C.R. = 19.280), as well as preventive and eco-efficient practices (C.R. = 5.023, C.R.= 14.185); these findings can serve as a basis for the creation or improvement of public policies that promote eco-friendly business practices, encouraging companies to adopt measures that favor environmental sustainability. Therefore, eco-friendly business practices have a positive impact on environmental sustainability in companies in a region of the Peruvian Amazon; in addition, preventive practices and eco-efficient practices have a positive impact on environmental sustainability in companies in a region of the Peruvian Amazon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".