MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405452604 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.9.005

A managerial perspective on the determinants and outcome of digital transformation in multinational corporations in Malaysia

2024· article· en· W4405452604 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ooi See Chiann, Karpal Singh Dara Singh, Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Sains Malaysia
KeywordsMultinational corporationBusinessDigital transformationPerspective (graphical)Context (archaeology)Outcome (game theory)Quality (philosophy)Knowledge managementMarketingBusiness administrationPolitical scienceEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary objective of this study was to examine the antecedents of digital transformation (DT) within multinational corporations (MNCs) in Malaysia, from the perspectives of corporate managers. Amidst limited research on DT within the MNC context, this paper examines the key drivers of DT in Malaysian MNCs. A quantitative method using non-probability sampling was used to gather the required data via the distribution of questionnaires among the MNCs’ managers. To evaluate the underlying theoretical model based on the collected data, we chose SmartPLS as the preferred method. Findings revealed that business value, digital leadership, inter-functional coordination and decision-making quality were significant drivers of DT, while DT exerted a positive influence on business performance. However, collaborative innovation did not have a significant relationship with digital transformation adoption in MNCs. The findings offer novel insights for both academics and international corporate managers, enhancing their understanding of the drivers behind DT adoption from the perspective of managers within MNCs in Malaysia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicOrganizational Leadership and Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207