Adoption deep learning approach using realistic synthetic data for enhancing network intrusion detection in intelligent vehicle systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the dynamic field of cybersecurity within intelligent vehicle systems, the sophistication of threats necessitates continual advancements in security technologies. Traditional Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) often fall short in detecting emerging and sophisticated intrusion methods, primarily due to their reliance on static datasets that fail to capture the nuanced dynamics and complexity of modern network intrusions. This study presents a sophisticated simulation for NIDS tailored to intelligent vehicle environments, utilizing the extensive capabilities of Scapy—a robust network manipulation tool—to generate a highly accurate dataset of network traffic reflective of real-world scenarios. We created a diverse dataset involving 100,000 network flows, covering a wide array of benign, malicious, and anomalous traffic patterns, to thoroughly evaluate the detection capabilities of our proposed system. This dataset was analyzed using a deep learning framework employing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which demonstrated outstanding performance metrics: an accuracy of 99.08%, precision of 98.96%, recall of 99.11%, and an F1 score of 99.03%. These metrics showcase the system's enhanced capability to precisely classify various network flows, emphasizing the importance of realistic synthetic data in boosting the training and accuracy of NIDS in intelligent vehicles. The results of this research are significant, marking a step forward towards more flexible and preemptive security measures for intelligent vehicles, and effectively narrowing the gap between simulation-based testing and real-world network environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".