STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF THE CHEKA PLUTON (SOUTHERN URALS): PETROMAGNETIC STUDIES AND FRACTURE ANALYSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Cheka pluton, located in the Magnitogorsk megazone of the Southern Urals and composed of the alkaline granitoids, is meridionally elongated (1–2)×6.5 km. The fracture and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility analysis was made on the Cheka pluton for the first time. The study materials comprise fracture measurements and core samples. The fractures were classified as either prototectonic or tectonic using the Stereonet software. The prototectonic fractures were classified into three standard types in accordance with the system proposed by G. Cloos: S, Q, and L. The system of tectonic fractures corresponds to the Riedel model, which confirms the formation of the pluton as a dextral magmatic strike-slip duplex supposed earlier. The analysis of magnetic mineralogy revealed that the most prevalent magnetic mineral is fine- to-medium-grained magnetite. Using the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility data, the main direction of melt flow during the formation of the pluton was determined to be 36° NE. This direction is in close alignment with the orientation of one of the prototectonic fracture systems, which has a strike azimuth of 39° NE. The constructed complex structure model indicates that the Triassic granitoid plutons of the Magnitogorsk megazone were most likely formed during the right-lateral transpression, associated with a local strike-slip fault-related extension zone. These conditions are generally consistent with the Triassic rifting and dextral strike-slip motion in the Southern Urals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".