MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405459830

[Saint-Jean-de-Dieu: A short history of Montreal's madhouse, 1873-1973].

2024· article· en· W4405459830 on OpenAlexaffabout
Isabelle Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAINTHumanitiesHistoryPhilosophyArtArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives The primary objective of this article is to paint an institutional portrait of the Saint-Jean-de-Dieu Asylum over the first hundred years of its existence, from 1873 to 1973. The secondary objectives are as follows: 1) explore how prevention policies at the end of the 19th century had the effect of increasing the asylum population rather than reducing it; 2) discuss mental health policies that sought to "treat the social" outside the walls of the asylum in an effort to decrease the population; and 3) address the arrival of psychopharmacology that opened the doors of the asylum and turned it into a modern psychiatric hospital, soon renamed Louis-Hippolyte-Lafontaine. Method Since the past exists in silence, and finding data that will enable us to reconstruct a history of Saint-Jean-de-Dieu is a challenge. Our data collection includes all the primary sources we were able to gather (Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal archives, annual government reports on asylums and articles in the magazine L'Union médicale du Canada) as well as secondary sources produced over time, i.e., books and articles published on the history of Saint-Jean-de-Dieu. The qualitative analysis of this data is based on analytical induction (Pascale, 2012). After several readings of the documents, the content is associated with key concepts according to theoretical saturation (Laperrière, 1997) and the data is analyzed according to the most significant key concepts. In our corpus, the key concept of overcrowding in asylums was central to our interpretation. Results This article highlights the improbable primary mission of curing mental disorders at the Saint-Jean-de-Dieu asylum. At the end of the 19th century, as urban impoverishment became increasingly marked, medical theories advocated policies of hasty internment. Despite several provincial laws reiterating that the chronically ill could only be admitted if they were "dangerous, scandalous or monstrous," the population admitted grew steadily until the end of the 1940s. At the same time, the patient/psychiatrist ratio was at best 300 to 1. The creation of a French-speaking psychiatry department and compulsory internships between the World Wars meant that more doctors were trained to work there. But it was the discovery of neuroleptics that enabled a new generation of psychiatrists to open the doors of the institution in the 1960s. The era of the asylum thus came to an end in the form it had taken for just over 100 years. Conclusion The asylum quickly lost its original meaning, that of a place of refuge, and gradually became associated with the seclusion of the insane, thereby increasing the prejudices and taboos surrounding mental disorders, some of which still affect us today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→