MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405464364 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae453

Biallelic <i>NDUFA13</i> variants lead to a neurodevelopmental phenotype with gradual neurological impairment

2024· letter· en· W4405464364 on OpenAlexafffund
Rauan Kaiyrzhanov, Kyle Thompson, Stéphanie Efthymiou, Askhat Mukushev, Akbota Zharylkassyn, Chitra Prasad, Ehsan Ghayoor Karimiani, Javeria Raza Alvi, Dmitriy Niyazov, Ahmad Alahmad, Meisam Babaei, Homa Tajsharghi, Buthaina Albash, Ahmad Alaqeel, Majida Charif, Narges Hashemi, Morteza Heidari, Seyed Mehdi Kalantar, Guy Lenaers, Mohammad Yahya Vahidi Mehrjardi, Varunvenkat M. Srinivasan, Vykuntaraju K. Gowda, Seyed Hamidreza Mirabutalebi, Deanna Alexis Carere, Mojtaba Movahedinia, David Murphy, Robert McFarland, Mohamed S. Abdel‐Hamid, Rasha M. Elhossini, Shahryar Alavi, Melanie Napier, Amaya Bélanger-Quintana, Asuri N. Prasad, Jessica Jakobczyk, Agathe Roubertie, Tony Rupar, Tipu Sultan, Mehran Beiraghi Toosi, Leonid A. Sazanov, Mariasavina Severino, Henry Houlden, Robert W. Taylor, Reza Maroofian

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLondon Health Sciences Centre
FundersMedical Research CouncilLily FoundationMuskelsvindfondenMedical Research Council CanadaKoning BoudewijnstichtingSeventh Framework ProgrammeUniversity College LondonAligning Science Across Parkinson’sGreat Ormond Street Hospital CharityNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchEuropean CommissionMultiple System Atrophy TrustBrain Research UKLifeArcWellcome TrustMito FoundationMuscular Dystrophy AssociationScience and Technology Development FundMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsMissense mutationPhenotypeHypotoniaOxidoreductaseBiologyGeneticsInternal medicineMedicineGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Biallelic variants in NADH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) + hydrogen (H))-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 1 alpha subcomplex 13 have been linked to mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 28, based on three affected individuals from two families. With only two families reported, the clinical and molecular spectrum of NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 1 alpha subcomplex 13–related diseases remains unclear. We report 10 additional affected individuals from nine independent families, identifying four missense variants (including recurrent c.170G > A) and three ultra-rare or novel predicted loss-of-function biallelic variants. Updated clinical–radiological data from previously reported families and a literature review compiling clinical features of all reported patients with isolated complex I deficiency caused by 43 genes encoding complex I subunits and assembly factors are also provided. Our cohort (mean age 7.8 ± 5.4 years; range 2.5–18) predominantly presented a moderate-to-severe neurodevelopmental syndrome with oculomotor abnormalities (84%), spasticity/hypertonia (83%), hypotonia (69%), cerebellar ataxia (66%), movement disorders (58%) and epilepsy (46%). Neuroimaging revealed bilateral symmetric T2 hyperintense substantia nigra lesions (91.6%) and optic nerve atrophy (66.6%). Protein modeling suggests missense variants destabilize a critical junction between the hydrophilic and membrane arms of complex I. Fibroblasts from two patients showed reduced complex I activity and compensatory complex IV activity increase. This study characterizes NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 1 alpha subcomplex 13–related disease in 13 individuals, highlighting genotype–phenotype correlations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207