Inexact alternating direction method of multipliers (InADMM) for the acceleration of l2−l1 inverse problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper develops and studies an improved version of the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM), named Inexact ADMM (InADMM), specifically designed for largescale optimization problems. The traditional implementation of ADMM can be challenging when applied to large-scale problems. The latter is particularly true in several largescale seismic applications. One subproblem, the x-update, entails solving a large system of equations in each iteration of the ADMM solver. This research addresses two fundamental questions: the precision required in solving the aforementioned linear system of equations at each nested iteration for assured global convergence and the optimal number of nested iterations. InADMM introduces a novel inexactness criterion based on the structure of the problem. This critical modification automates and streamlines the resolution of nested iterations. We demonstrate the application of InADMM with two classical problems in seismic processing and inversion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it