MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405469530 · doi:10.1190/image2024-4099652.1

Kriging-based surrogate models for convergence acceleration of Markov chains: An example of magnetotellurics-dix joint inversion

2024· article· en· W4405469530 on OpenAlexaff
Alejandro Quiaro, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsInversion (geology)AccelerationKrigingMarkov chainConvergence (economics)Joint (building)GeologyMarkov processComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsSeismologyMachine learningEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsElectrical resistivity and conductivityStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A probabilistic model is presented to jointly invert magnetotelluric data and root mean square (RMS) velocities using a reduced model space based on kriging surrogates. Under the assumption that the resistivity and velocity models are smooth fields that a Gaussian process can represent, we select a reduced representation of the original model space to perform Bayesian inference. The surrogate models were later used to perform probabilistic joint inversion using a petrophysical constraint. The petrophysical constraint corresponds to a Multivariate Normal Distribution based on Faust’s equation built using uncertainty propagation. It allows the creation of a Markov Chain from a reduced model space, where the velocity-resistivity covariance is depth-dependent. The model fields reconstructed with kriging are generally smooth. Therefore, the required burn-in to go from the initial model to smooth models is significantly reduced, which helps reach a stationary chain with fewer iterations. The posterior sampling is done based on the Metropolis-Hastings rule. A synthetic example that exhibits a hidden resistive layer is chosen to test the workflow. Models extracted from the posterior explain the observed data within the expected tolerance levels while also satisfying the selected petrophysical coupling function. The results are encouraging since they show that a reduced representation of the model space can be used to effectively explore complex posterior probability distributions to solve multiphysics problems that are highly non-unique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207