MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405476388 · doi:10.1039/d4ta06444e

Investigation of charge transfer models on the evolution of phases in lithium iron phosphate batteries using phase-field simulations

2024· article· en· W4405476388 on OpenAlexafffund
Souzan Hammadi, Peter Broqvist, Daniel Brandell, Nana Ofori-Opoku

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Chemistry A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityBrockhouse Institute for Materials Research
FundersNational Supercomputer Centre, Linköpings UniversitetNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science CouncilStand Up for Energy
KeywordsLithium iron phosphateLithium (medication)Phase (matter)Charge (physics)PhosphateMaterials scienceField (mathematics)Transfer (computing)Chemical physicsChemistryComputer sciencePhysicsThermodynamicsBattery (electricity)BiologyPower (physics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phase evolution in batteries are more reliably modelled by the Marcus–Hush–Chidsey expression, as it modulates the current density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Chemistry ASame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207