MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405478705 · doi:10.1094/pdis-10-24-2134-pdn

Occurrence of Snake River Alfalfa Virus in Alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i>) in Oregon and in Northern California

2024· article· en· W4405478705 on OpenAlexaff
Gardenia E. Orellana, Casey H. Messman, Edison Reyes-Proaño, Amber Moore, Erik J. Wenninger, Alexander V. Karasev

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAlfalfa mosaic virusMedicago sativaAgronomyCropForageLegumePerennial plantGrowing seasonHay

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a commonly grown forage crop in Oregon and California harvested on 350,000 and 480,000 acres, respectively, in 2023 (USDA-NASS 2023). Forage alfalfa is grown as a perennial crop for about four years in the same field and each season, the crop is cut 3-4 times for hay production. Consequently, each plant is exposed to a variety of biotic stresses including virus infections, with pathogens accumulating in the crop over years. Alfalfa was recognized in the past as a reservoir of legume viruses posing threats to peas and other legumes in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) of the United States (Hampton and Weber 1983; Kaiser et al. 1993). The most common viruses found in alfalfa in PNW are aphid-transmitted alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), bean leafroll virus (BLRV), and pea streak virus (PeSV) (Hampton and Weber 1983; Kaiser et al. 1993; Larsen 2015; Dahan et al. 2022; Postnikova et al. 2023). Recently, a new virus, Snake River alfalfa virus (SRAV) was described from alfalfa in Idaho (Dahan et al. 2022), in Washington (Postnikova et al. 2023), and in Europe (Meseguer et al. 2024). Within PNW, surveys of alfalfa viruses in Oregon were not conducted for the past 30 years, and to fill in this knowledge gap on alfalfa viruses in the State of Oregon, a survey was initiated in the summer 2023. One-hundred thirty-nine leaf samples were collected from 13 alfalfa fields across Oregon, from four fields in Southern Idaho, and from four fields in Northern California between July 15 to September 5, 2023. Five to seven individual samples per field, exhibiting various virus-like symptoms, such as mosaic, chlorotic spots, leaf deformations, and yellowing, were collected randomly, placed in paper bags and shipped to the laboratory at the University of Idaho. Total nucleic acids were extracted from leaf tissue within 3-5 days after the field collections using the Dellaporta methodology (Dellaporta et al. 1983). Reverse transcription (RT) PCR was conducted according to the previously described protocol with specific primers for AMV, BLRV, and SRAV described by Dahan et al. (2022). For PeSV detection, two specific primers, PeSV_2F: TCACTGGATCATGGCYTTTG and PeSV_2R: AACCTTGAATCCTGACGCAA were designed and used in RT-PCR. In virus-positive samples, PCR fragments were treated with Exosap-It (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), submitted for Sanger sequencing to Elim Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Hayward, CA), and confirmed to be virus-specific. The partial sequences of the alfalfa viruses found in Oregon, Idaho, and California were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PQ451070 to PQ451075 (PeSV), PQ451076 to PQ451087 (BLRV), PQ451088 to PQ451108 (AMV), and PQ467775 to PQ467806 (SRAV). Out of 139 samples tested, 61 were AMV-positive, 51 were BLRV-positive, 81 were SRAV-positive, and 6 were PeSV-positive. In-field prevalence varied between the four viruses, ranging for PeSV from 0% (1 field in CA, 4 fields in ID, and 8 fields in OR) to 43% (1 field in CA); for BLRV from 0% (2 fields in CA, 2 fields in ID, and 3 fields in OR) to 100% (2 fields in CA); for AMV from 0% (2 fields in CA and 4 fields in ID) to 100% (1 field in OR); for SRAV from 0% (2 fields in CA) to 100% (1 field in OR). Multiple samples had mixed infections of 2, 3, and even 4 viruses (1 sample from CA and 1 sample from OR). The role of each of these viruses in observed alfalfa virus-like symptoms and in an overall effect on productivity awaits further investigation. While SRAV was found before in alfalfa fields in Idaho (Dahan et al. 2022) and Washington (Postnikova et al. 2023), this is the first report of the virus presence in alfalfa crops in Oregon and in Northern California.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207