MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405482860 · doi:10.1080/10589759.2024.2441978

A light-weight factorized convolutions based dual-input fuzzy-CNN for efficient motor bearing fault diagnosis

2024· article· en· W4405482860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNondestructive Testing And Evaluation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceFeature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)WaveletFuzzy logicArtificial intelligenceFault (geology)Entropy (arrow of time)Bearing (navigation)ComputationCondition monitoringData miningAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient and timely identification of bearing faults is imperative to ensure operational normalcy, reduced down-times and health hazards in motor fault tolerant control systems. This paper proposes a fault diagnosis method that combines the vibration information with time-varying rotational speed for effective fault diagnosis under non-stationary conditions. The complex wavelet transform is used to encode both the vibrational and rotational signals in 2d representations for spatial feature extraction. An efficient algorithm is proposed to select the mother wavelet with the least average entropy. Moreover, a spatial decomposition-based approach using factorised convolutions is used to create a light-weight fuzzy convolutional neural network named Split-Operation Fuzzy Convolutional Neural Network (SOF-CNN) for semi rule-based feature extraction and classification. The performance was evaluated on the University of Ottawa (UOO) dataset for multiple speed conditions and cross-condition validation with the highest accuracy yield being 99.92% from the fourth condition and 3rd trial acquired via averaged 10-Fold Cross Validation. The average accuracy yield across all the scenario was 99.89% with 64.73% being the highest accuracy for cross-condition validation. The performance was evaluated across a diverse range of evaluation criterion including both quantitative and statistical tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it