MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405484539 · doi:10.5539/jfr.v14n1p74

Effects of Cricket Powder on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Pork Quality, Physicochemical, and Sensory Analyses of Finishing Swine

2024· article· en· W4405484539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCricketFood scienceQuality (philosophy)Sensory systemBiologyBiotechnologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feeding pigs, a balanced diet is an important factor to promote growth performance and results in higher yield and quality pork. Alternative ingredients such as cricket powder (CP) can be used as a substitution to provide high-quality protein for swine. Therefore, this experiment was investigated the effects of cricket powder on growth performance, carcass traits, pork quality, physicochemical, and sensory analyses of finishing swine. Eight finishing hogs (Hampshire cross) were allotted to two treatments: 1) control (0% CP) and 2) control + 2% CP (CP replaced SBM), for 34 days. All treatments were analyzed for growth and carcass performance (ADG, ADFI, G: F, LEA, BF, HCW, and DP), sensory evaluation (9-point hedonic scale with 14 trained panelists), physicochemical (nutrition content, pH, moisture (%), ash content, color (L*, a*, b*), lipid oxidation (TBARS)), and microbiological analysis (aerobic heterotrophs (AH), E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae). Pork loin samples coated with 2% CP were used for all treatments, except the control treatment. Each treatment was prepared and stored at 3°C for 9 days. The results showed that the control diet pigs outgained pigs fed 2% CP 1.03 kg/d vs. 0.62 kg/d. There was no difference (p>0.05) in ADFI or G: F regardless of treatment. Pigs fed 2% CP tended to have greater DP (80.10% vs. 78.21%). The 2% CP treatment obtained the highest scores for all sensory attributes, acceptability (85.71%), and purchase intent (71.43%). Adding 2% CP improved the crude fiber (4.44%), iron (13.60 ppm), and zinc contents (21.50 ppm). Pigs fed 2% CP had increased (p<0.05) a* redness (10.51), pH value (5.91), and moisture content (73.03%). No E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae were detected in this experiment. In addition, samples with 2% CP increased redness values, decreased lipid oxidation, and decreased aerobic heterotrophs counts compared to the control treatment. Thus, our results suggest that adding cricket powder in swine production can be used to promote sustainability, enhance meat color, decrease undesirable microorganism growth, and prolong the shelf-life of pork loin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it