MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405484648 · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25010

Milk production and methane emissions from dairy cows fed silages from different grassland species and harvesting frequencies

2024· article· en· W4405484648 on OpenAlexaff
Kim Viggo Weiby, Linda Årvik, M. Eknæs, Angela Schwarm, Håvard Steinshamn, K. A. Beauchemin, Peter Lund, Ingunn Schei, Ingjerd Dønnem

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersTINENorges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige UniversitetFoundation for Research Levy on Agricultural ProductsNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsSilageMilkingLolium perenneRed CloverAnimal scienceAgronomyDairy cattleBiologyTotal mixed rationLolium multiflorumPhleumPerennial plantChemistryIce calvingLactation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to examine how silages from different grassland species and harvesting frequencies affect feed intake, milk production, and methane (CH 4 ) emission in dairy cows. We hypothesized that cows consuming silages of more frequent harvest, grass species with greater OM digestibility and legumes with lower NDFom concentration would have greater silage DMI and milk yield and thereby lower CH 4 yield and intensity. Forty Norwegian Red cows were allocated to 5 treatments in a cyclic changeover design with four 21-d periods (14 d of adaptation, 7 d of data collection). The 5 treatments evaluated were silages produced from timothy ( Phleum pratense L.) in a 3-cut system (T3), timothy in a 2-cut system (T2), perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) in a 3-cut system (PR3), red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.) in a 3-cut system (RC3) and a mix of T3 and RC3 (50:50 on DM basis; T3/RC3). The treatments were prepared by mixing silages from each crop over the growing season, proportional to the harvested DM yield of each cut. Cows were offered the mixed silages ad libitum supplemented with a fixed level of concentrate. Gas emissions were measured using 2 Greenfeed units. Milk yield was recorded in the milking robot at each visit, and milk samples were collected at 3 consecutive milkings during the last 7 d of each period. Cows were weighed after each milking, and total-tract digestibility of each diet was estimated using acid insoluble ash as internal marker in fecal grab samples. The data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with block, period, and treatment as fixed effects and animal within block as random effect. Silage and total DMI did not differ between T3 and T2, but total DMI was lower for PR3 than for T3. There was a quadratic effect of increased proportion of red clover, with highest intakes of T3/RC3 and lower intakes of RC3 than of T3. Energy-corrected milk yield was lower for T2 than T3, and for PR3 than T3. There was a quadratic effect of increased proportion of red clover, with highest ECM yield in T3/RC3 and lower in RC3 than in T3. Organic matter digestibility was lower for T2 than T3, but it did not differ between T3 and PR3. Including red clover in the diet linearly decreased OM digestibility. Methane production (g/d) did not differ between T3 and T2, but CH 4 intensity (g/kg ECM) was greater for T2 than for T3. There was no difference between T3 and PR3 for CH 4 production but yield and intensity were greater for PR3 than T3. Including red clover in the diet linearly increased CH 4 production, yield and intensity with greatest intensity in the 100% red clover diet. In conclusion, changing harvesting frequency for timothy from 2 to 3 harvests per year did not affect CH 4 production or yield, but CH 4 intensity was reduced. Replacing timothy with perennial ryegrass and increased inclusion rate of red clover both increased CH 4 yield and intensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→