Increasing environmental fluctuations can dampen variability of endogenously cycling populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding how populations respond to increasingly variable conditions is a major objective for natural resource managers forecasting extinction risk. The lesson from current modelling is clear: increasing environmental variability increases population abundance variability. We show that this paradigm fails to describe a broad class of empirically observed dynamics, namely endogenously driven population cycles. In contrast to the dominant paradigm, these populations can exhibit reduced long-run population variance under increasing environmental variability. We provide evidence for a mechanistic explanation of this phenomenon that relies on how stochasticity interacts with long transient dynamics present in the deterministic cycling model. This interaction stands in contrast to the often assumed additivity of stochastic and deterministic drivers of population fluctuations. We show evidence for the phenomenon in two cyclical populations: flour beetles and Canadian lynx. We quantify the impact of the phenomenon with new theory that partitions the effects of nonlinear dynamics and stochastic variation on dynamical systems. In both empirical examples, the partitioning shows that the interaction between deterministic and stochastic dynamics reduces the variance in population size. Our results highlight that previous predictions about extinction under environmental variability may prove inadequate to understand the effects of climate change in some populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".