MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405488117 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2024.3519331

A Prediction-Enhanced Physical-to-Virtual Twin Connectivity Framework for Human Digital Twin

2024· article· en· W4405488117 on OpenAlexafffund
Samuel D. Okegbile, Jun Cai, Junjie Wu, Jiayuan Chen, Changyan Yi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of the Fraser Valley
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new secure and privacy-preserving prediction-enhanced solution for reliable physical-to-virtual communications in human digital twin (HDT) systems. With such a prediction-enhanced connectivity (PeHDT) framework, the evolution of any virtual twin (VT) could be triggered in real-time or in advance using the expected state of its physical counterpart. This ensures the continuous maintenance of a true replica of each physical twin (PT), thus relieving the need for timely PT-VT synchronization while the VT-experienced delay is reduced to zero or close to zero. We adopted a secured federated multi-task learning technique to meet the security and privacy constraints of HDT and employed a single server discrete-time batch-service queue framework when characterizing the batching process to reduce the communication burden. Furthermore, we introduced a prediction verification framework to improve the performance of the proposed PeHDT framework. The resulting problem was formulated as a constrained Markov decision process and was solved by introducing a primary-dual deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm. Through a joint investigation of communication, batching and prediction verification schemes, the simulation results show that the proposed PeHDT framework can greatly reduce both the VT-experienced delay and the PT-VT communication time without compromising the specific requirements of HDT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and NetworkingSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207