Hardware Accelerator for a Power Efficient Single-lead Dry-electrode ECG Wearable Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring wearables are becoming candidate technologies for long-term remote monitoring applications. Current wearable disadvantages include high power consumption from computational complex pre-processing leading to low battery life. A hardware (HW) architecture for dry electrode-based ECG signal processing to increase wearable longevity is proposed. The technology is based off an analog-front end (AFE) chip combined with a field programmable gated arrays (FPGA)-based optimized cubic Hermite interpolation approach for signal processing. This system is deployed on a FPGA board featuring a single-core processor. The architecture uses 0.01 W, utilizes 0.67% and 0.44% of available look-up-tables (LUTs) and flip-flops (FFs) components on FPGA and performed real-time signal processing. Signal quality indexes (SQIs) and signal to noise ratios (SNR) information are computed where the HW processed signals showed an average SNR of 16.4 dB. ECG R-peaks are visually identified, making this architecture suitable for heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV) estimations in long-term dry-electrode single-lead ECG monitoring applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".