MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405492474 · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100860

The association between sleep and eating disorders in Canada before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

2024· article· en· W4405492474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of WindsorUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanMcGill UniversityHôpital Rivière-des-Prairies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Association (psychology)Sleep (system call)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Eating disordersMedicinePsychiatryPsychologyVirologyOutbreakInternal medicineComputer scienceDiseasePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Sleep disturbances were prevalent in people with EDs before the COVID-19 pandemic. • There was a significant deterioration in sleep quality during the pandemic. • Individuals with remitted EDs remain vulnerable to sleep disruptions. • Mental health practitioners should attend to sleep difficulties in people with EDs. Sleep disturbances are prevalent among individuals with eating disorders (EDs), yet limited research has explored the interplay between EDs and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to compare 1) self-reported sleep quality before the pandemic (retrospectively) among individuals with current EDs, remitted EDs, and controls (no psychiatric history); and 2) sleep quality differences among these groups from before to during the pandemic. Participants ( N = 1033) completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and reported anxiety and depression symptoms for the month before the pandemic onset (retrospectively) and during the pandemic. One-way ANCOVAs compared sleep quality among groups before the pandemic, adjusting for anxiety and depression symptoms and demographics. Repeated measures ANCOVAs assessed sleep quality differences between before and during the pandemic, controlling for the same covariates. Pre-pandemic, individuals with current EDs reported the highest sleep disturbance levels, followed by those with remitted EDs and controls ( F (2, 955) = 11.01, p < 0.001). During the pandemic, sleep disturbance worsened across all groups, with individuals in current and remitted ED groups experiencing a more significant deterioration than controls, even when accounting for anxiety and depression symptoms ( p < 0.05). The cross-sectional design and retrospective self-reports of sleep quality. Individuals with current and remitted EDs seemed to be vulnerable to sleep disruptions during the pandemic. Sleep disruptions may persist during ED remission. Awareness of these dynamics can enhance mental health practitioners’ attention to sleep disruptions in adults with current or remitted EDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it