Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueDecision Sciences · 2024
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Colorado DenverCalifornia State University, FullertonUniversity of Colorado BoulderSouthern University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaUniversidad Carlos III de MadridThammasat UniversityHainan UniversityMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Hong KongFudan UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityDalhousie UniversityAalto-YliopistoXiamen UniversitySungkyunkwan UniversityKorea UniversityUniversität ZürichHonam UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteChung-Ang UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesSouth China University of TechnologyErasmus Universiteit RotterdamMonash UniversityUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesDurham UniversitySouthern Methodist UniversityWebster UniversitySan José State UniversityUniversitetet i StavangerUniversität zu KölnShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityJames Madison UniversityUniversity of AlabamaTemple UniversityKennesaw State UniversitySanta Clara UniversityUniversity of MelbourneIowa State UniversityNanjing Institute of TechnologyUniversiteit van TilburgHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityOld Dominion UniversityNazarbayev UniversitySeoul National UniversityUniversity of North TexasUniversity of OregonQueen's UniversityUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonOregon State UniversityUniversity of MiamiUniversity of South CarolinaUniversity of WashingtonUniversité du LuxembourgGeorgia State UniversityUniversity of South FloridaUniversity of CincinnatiPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnUniversity of Notre DameVillanova UniversityAuburn UniversityMichigan State UniversityUtah State UniversityRutgers, The State University of New JerseyLingnan UniversityOhio State UniversityUniversity of St. ThomasTianjin UniversityBoise State UniversityWashington State UniversityOklahoma State UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaTongji UniversityLehigh UniversityUniversität HamburgRenmin University of ChinaNorthern Illinois UniversityCity, University of LondonVirginia Commonwealth UniversityArizona State UniversityUniversity of Nevada, RenoUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonSyracuse UniversityWest Virginia UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaGeorgia Southern UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutDonghua UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityTexas Christian UniversityImperial College LondonPortland State UniversityYork UniversityGeorge Mason University
KeywordsComputer scienceBusinessKnowledge management
Abstract
Variable-weight combined forecasting model with
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.795
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.205 | 0.883 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes