MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405509647 · doi:10.17352/ojt.000047

Exploring Loneliness, Social Support and Adaptability of International Students in Canada during COVID-19

2024· article· en· W4405509647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Soung-Hoon Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Journal of Trauma · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessAdaptabilityPsychologyFeelingSocial isolationUCLA Loneliness ScaleSocial supportSocial distanceMental healthScale (ratio)PandemicSocial psychologyMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeographyPsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic has had extraordinary adverse effects, negatively impacting people’s physical health, mental health, and well-being. Measures such as quarantine, lockdown, and social distancing have exacerbated social isolation, loneliness, and mental health challenges. International students, as a particularly vulnerable population, confronted numerous challenges, including a lack of social support and networks. They required considerable adaptability to cope with the changes and uncertainties brought about by the pandemic. This study explored the effects of loneliness, and social support on the adaptability of international students in Canada during the pandemic. Specifically, it aimed to: a) Examine the relationships among loneliness, social support, and adaptability. b) Investigate the potential moderating effect of social support on the relationship between feelings of loneliness and adaptability. Methods: We recruited 186 international students attending universities in Canada to complete the informed consent and an online survey during the pandemic COVID-19. Participants took approximately 40 minutes; a $10 Amazon gift card was offered to the participants as an appreciation. Participants were measured on the UCLA Loneliness Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, Adaptability Scale, and demographic questions. The data analysis was conducted in IBM SPSS 26. Results: During the pandemic COVID-19, international students in Canada demonstrated that better adaptability was significantly associated with lower levels of loneliness and greater social support. Feelings of loneliness were found to negatively impact predicted adaptability; however, the effect was fully moderated by the presence of social support. Additionally, the findings highlighted gender differences in how international students adapted to the challenges of the pandemic. Discussion and conclusion: Our discussion focuses on practical suggestions that can help international students enhance their adaptability and build stronger social support networks, ultimately reducing feelings of loneliness while studying abroad in Canada. Our conclusions emphasize the importance of enhancing adaptability among international university students to reduce feelings of loneliness during the pandemic COVID-19 in Canada. We also recommend prioritizing social support as a protective factor, which plays a crucial role in mediating the effects of loneliness on adaptability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.256
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Journal of Trauma→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→