MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405511023 · doi:10.1186/s12880-024-01523-x

Deep superpixel generation and clustering for weakly supervised segmentation of brain tumors in MR images

2024· article· en· W4405511023 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Imaging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickVector InstituteCanada Research ChairsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround truthComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSegmentationCluster analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Pipeline (software)Classifier (UML)Sørensen–Dice coefficientDeep learningImage segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Training machine learning models to segment tumors and other anomalies in medical images is an important step for developing diagnostic tools but generally requires manually annotated ground truth segmentations, which necessitates significant time and resources. We aim to develop a pipeline that can be trained using readily accessible binary image-level classification labels, to effectively segment regions of interest without requiring ground truth annotations. METHODS: This work proposes the use of a deep superpixel generation model and a deep superpixel clustering model trained simultaneously to output weakly supervised brain tumor segmentations. The superpixel generation model's output is selected and clustered together by the superpixel clustering model. Additionally, we train a classifier using binary image-level labels (i.e., labels indicating whether an image contains a tumor), which is used to guide the training by localizing undersegmented seeds as a loss term. The proposed simultaneous use of superpixel generation and clustering models, and the guided localization approach allow for the output weakly supervised tumor segmentations to capture contextual information that is propagated to both models during training, resulting in superpixels that specifically contour the tumors. We evaluate the performance of the pipeline using Dice coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and compare the performance to state-of-the-art baselines. These baselines include the state-of-the-art weakly supervised segmentation method using both seeds and superpixels (CAM-S), and the Segment Anything Model (SAM). RESULTS: We used 2D slices of magnetic resonance brain scans from the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) 2020 dataset and labels indicating the presence of tumors to train and evaluate the pipeline. On an external test cohort from the BraTS 2023 dataset, our method achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.745 and a mean HD95 of 20.8, outperforming all baselines, including CAM-S and SAM, which resulted in mean Dice coefficients of 0.646 and 0.641, and mean HD95 of 21.2 and 27.3, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed combination of deep superpixel generation, deep superpixel clustering, and the incorporation of undersegmented seeds as a loss term improves weakly supervised segmentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it