MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405516496 · doi:10.1080/00295450.2024.2431777

Range Safety Considerations for Processing and Launching Reactor-Based Space Nuclear Systems

2024· article· en· W4405516496 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara C. Fisher, M. Granger, Mikaela Blood, N. DeSotel

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear engineeringRange (aeronautics)Nuclear reactorSpace (punctuation)Environmental scienceComputer scienceAerospace engineeringEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Space nuclear systems (SNSs) present a robust source of power and/or propulsion technology that will fundamentally enhance and expand deep-space mission capability. In this era of space nuclear renaissance, there are several active U.S. SNS programs, one of which is seeking the first space reactor launch approval of the modern era. SNSs present complex systems with unique and novel challenges for established launch safety procedures, particularly for prelaunch and initial launch operations as prescribed by the U.S. government’s federal ranges. This paper examines high-level range safety considerations for a model expander cycle nuclear thermal propulsion SNS during ground processing and the pad and launch operational phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear TechnologySame topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207