MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405516496 · doi:10.1080/00295450.2024.2431777

Range Safety Considerations for Processing and Launching Reactor-Based Space Nuclear Systems

2024· article· en· W4405516496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear engineeringRange (aeronautics)Nuclear reactorSpace (punctuation)Environmental scienceComputer scienceAerospace engineeringEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Space nuclear systems (SNSs) present a robust source of power and/or propulsion technology that will fundamentally enhance and expand deep-space mission capability. In this era of space nuclear renaissance, there are several active U.S. SNS programs, one of which is seeking the first space reactor launch approval of the modern era. SNSs present complex systems with unique and novel challenges for established launch safety procedures, particularly for prelaunch and initial launch operations as prescribed by the U.S. government’s federal ranges. This paper examines high-level range safety considerations for a model expander cycle nuclear thermal propulsion SNS during ground processing and the pad and launch operational phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it