MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405517290 · doi:10.7202/1114681ar

Obstacles à l’équité et à l’intégration scolaire des élèves immigrants au Québec

2024· article· fr· W4405517290 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aline Niyubahwe, Joséphine Mukamurera

Bibliographic record

VenueApprendre et enseigner aujourd’hui Revue du Conseil pédagogique interdisciplinaire du Québec · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationPolitical scienceSociologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le nombre d’élèves immigrants de cultures, de langues et d’ethnies diverses ne cesse de croître dans les écoles québécoises. L’intégration scolaire de ces élèves constitue un enjeu important pour l’école puisqu’elle doit leur assurer les mêmes chances de réussite que les autres élèves. Or, les recherches montrent que ces élèves s’adaptent difficilement aux normes scolaires et aux codes culturels de la société d’accueil. Cet article a pour objectif de décrire et comprendre les obstacles à l’intégration des élèves immigrants selon le point de vue des parents immigrants. Les résultats d’une recherche qualitative menée au moyen d’entrevues semi-structurées auprès des parents immigrants des régions de Montréal, Gatineau et Sherbrooke permettent de comprendre que plusieurs obstacles institutionnels nuisent à l’intégration des élèves immigrants. Les résultats permettent également d’envisager certaines pistes de solutions favorables à l’équité et à l’inclusion scolaire de ces élèves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApprendre et enseigner aujourd’hui Revue du Conseil pédagogique interdisciplinaire du QuébecSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207