MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405518132 · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3519788

Principles, Applications, and Challenges of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Enabled Backscatter Communication: A Comprehensive Survey and Outlook

2024· article· en· W4405518132 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Han, Jinming Wang, Cheng Li, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBackscatter (email)Computer scienceSurface (topology)Remote sensingSystems engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringGeographyWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Backscatter communication (BackCom) networks are expected to provide ultra-low-power transmission and massive connectivity in future wireless communication systems. Nevertheless, the double-fading effect significantly reduces signal intensity and is a primary problem of modern BackCom systems. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS) can artificially modify the wireless environment through numerous controllable reflecting elements. With the help of RIS, the desired signals in the BackCom procedure can be captured and reflected in the specified direction, which is able to alleviate the double-fading problem. Specifically, RIS can be a backscatter device to send information instead of a collaborator to enhance transmission, yielding the RIS-BackCom mechanism. However, a comprehensive review of this technique still needs to be made available, dramatically limiting its development. This paper presents the fundamental principles and functions of legacy BackCom systems, the RIS technique, and RIS-BackCom networks. Then, we discuss the system-level performance with different modulation and channel estimation approaches. Further, we introduce symbiotic radio (SR) networks developed from the RIS-BackCom technique. After that, we provide a survey on diverse optimization issues existing in the applications of RIS-BackCom networks. Finally, we envision emerging use scenarios, potential challenges, and possible solutions in future wireless communication networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications Surveys & TutorialsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207