Clinical Characterization and Prognostic Risk Factors of Susac Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare disorder characterized by encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusion, and sensorineural hearing loss, often accompanied by vertigo. Recent updates to diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines have been made. This study examines clinical manifestations; disease activity; and risk factors of disability, dependency, and return to work in patients with SuS. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 20 consecutive patients with SuS with at least 2 years of follow-up. Clinical and paraclinical activities were assessed and rated according to the severity at onset and the end of follow-up. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment while disability and dependence in daily activities were measured using the modified Rankin Scale. Employment status was graded. RESULTS: The mean age at onset was 38.9 years, with a mean follow-up of 55.9 months. The female-to-male ratio was 1.86, and 45% of patients had the complete clinical triad. Severe cerebral involvement at onset was associated with a higher risk of cerebral exacerbations within the first year and with an increased long-term disability and dependency. Cognitive function improved in 75% of patients during follow-up. At disease onset, hearing loss excluding low frequencies occurred in 46.7%. Relapse of hearing loss was associated with greater impairment in daily activities. Male sex and elevated CSF protein levels were linked to poorer prognosis. Cerebral and inner ear exacerbations were most common in the first year while retinal exacerbations occurred more frequently, mainly within the first 2 years. Approximately 50% of patients resumed employment while 25% did not return to work. DISCUSSION: Current treatment strategies for SuS do not fully prevent relapses. Severe brain manifestation at onset, male sex, and high CSF protein levels are risk factors of a worse prognosis of disability and dependence, indicating the need for intensive treatment. High-frequency hearing loss does not exclude SuS diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".