MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405519437 · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000200357

Clinical Characterization and Prognostic Risk Factors of Susac Syndrome

2024· article· en· W4405519437 on OpenAlex
Lior Fuchs, Adi Wilf‐Yarkoni, Hadar Kolb, Ifat Vigiser, Keren Regev, Dinah Zur, Zohar Habot‐Wilner, Yahav Oron, Victoria Furer, Nitai Shimon, Mark A. Hellmann, Itay Lotan, Eitan Auriel, Robert M. Rennebohm, Ori Elkayam, Arnon Karni

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare disorder characterized by encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusion, and sensorineural hearing loss, often accompanied by vertigo. Recent updates to diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines have been made. This study examines clinical manifestations; disease activity; and risk factors of disability, dependency, and return to work in patients with SuS. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 20 consecutive patients with SuS with at least 2 years of follow-up. Clinical and paraclinical activities were assessed and rated according to the severity at onset and the end of follow-up. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment while disability and dependence in daily activities were measured using the modified Rankin Scale. Employment status was graded. RESULTS: The mean age at onset was 38.9 years, with a mean follow-up of 55.9 months. The female-to-male ratio was 1.86, and 45% of patients had the complete clinical triad. Severe cerebral involvement at onset was associated with a higher risk of cerebral exacerbations within the first year and with an increased long-term disability and dependency. Cognitive function improved in 75% of patients during follow-up. At disease onset, hearing loss excluding low frequencies occurred in 46.7%. Relapse of hearing loss was associated with greater impairment in daily activities. Male sex and elevated CSF protein levels were linked to poorer prognosis. Cerebral and inner ear exacerbations were most common in the first year while retinal exacerbations occurred more frequently, mainly within the first 2 years. Approximately 50% of patients resumed employment while 25% did not return to work. DISCUSSION: Current treatment strategies for SuS do not fully prevent relapses. Severe brain manifestation at onset, male sex, and high CSF protein levels are risk factors of a worse prognosis of disability and dependence, indicating the need for intensive treatment. High-frequency hearing loss does not exclude SuS diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it