Unmasking culprits: novel analysis identifies complement factors as potential therapeutic targets to mitigate inflammation during children's heart surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) causes systemic inflammation during pediatric cardiac surgery, which can contribute to post-operative organ dysfunction and prolonged recovery. This study aims to identify key inflammatory mediators related to this clinically significant immunologic response. Methods Pediatric patients were enrolled in a single-arm prospective clinical study (NCT05154864) and received standard cardiac operation, CPB and subzero-balance ultrafiltration. Arterial samples were taken before CPB initiation and immediately after weaning, and concentrations of 33 inflammatory mediators were assayed. A principal component analysis with hierarchical clustering (PCA-HCPC) included inflammatory mediator concentrations measured at the end of CPB, validated peak post-operative clinical scores, ventilation time and intensive care length of stay. Mahalanobis distance assessed statistical differences between clusters. Spearman’s correlation described the linear relationship between mediator concentrations at the end of CPB and intensive care length of stay. Results are median (IQR). Results Forty consecutive patients were enrolled; the majority were male (58%), age of 7.3 (1.7–39.0) months and weight of 6.7 (4.6–14.9) kg. The PCA-HCPC revealed activated complement factors along with all peak clinical scores and prolonged intensive care requirements in the same cluster. Cytokine, chemokine, and leukocyte adhesion molecule concentrations were found in two other distinct clusters (Mahalanobis distance = 16.5; p = 0.004 and Mahalanobis distance = 17.4; p = 5.8 × 10 –4 ). Mediator concentrations of C2 (Rho = 0.50; p = 0.001), C3 (Rho = 0.58; p = 1.1 × 10 –4 ), C3b (Rho = 0.47; p = 0.002), C5 (Rho = 0.48; p = 0.002) and C5a (Rho = 0.63; 1.7 × 10 –5 ) showed linear correlations with intensive care unit length of stay. Conclusions Activated complement factors, but not pro-inflammatory cytokines or chemokines, were most related to cardiopulmonary dysfunction and prolonged recovery in this novel analysis. Investigation of therapies that inhibit complement to dampen CPB-associated inflammation and enhance recovery after pediatric cardiac surgery is warranted. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05154864
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".