MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405529527 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2024.15.0031

Study on the Role of Selenium in Enhancing Stress Resistance and Quality Improvement of Strawberries

2024· article· en· W4405529527 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoling Zhang, Xiaohua Zhou, Xu Shan, Zuoxin Tang, Yu Lin Zhong, Haiying Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYunnan Provincial Department of Education
KeywordsBiologySeleniumResistance (ecology)BiotechnologyQuality (philosophy)AgronomyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strawberries are widely favored for their high nutritional value and economic benefits, but their yield and quality are often constrained by various environmental stresses. This study explores the mechanisms by which selenium alleviates salt stress, heavy metal pollution, and drought stress in strawberries, including enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity, optimizing water use efficiency, and maintaining cell membrane stability to improve stress tolerance. The results demonstrate that selenium application promotes strawberry growth and development under extreme conditions, enhances fruit quality, and boosts market competitiveness. Moreover, selenium biofortification effectively increases the content of functional compounds such as flavonoids and polyphenols in strawberry fruits, significantly improving sugar-acid balance and flavor characteristics. However, further research is needed to optimize selenium application, focusing on dosage, safety, and synergistic interactions with other nutrients for practical agricultural promotion. This study provides critical insights for the development of selenium-enriched strawberry varieties and sustainable agricultural practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207