MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405533212 · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2024.101309

Safe delivery of goods and services with smart door locks: Unlocking potential use

2024· article· en· W4405533212 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorges ForskningsrådRéseau de cancérologie Rossy
KeywordsBusinessInternet privacyComputer securityComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Smart door locks make possible unattended delivery of goods and services. • Characteristics of potential users and non-users of smart door locks for goods and service delivery were studied to identify upscaling potential. • Results revealed that e-commerce innovation adoptions are affected by technological trust, social trust, and life management needs. • Results indicate that differentiated upscaling strategies is necessary to fully utilize smart door locks for service and goods delivery. • We propose an adopter typology which can be used to develop upscaling strategies for smart door locks for home delivery. The purpose of this paper is to identify the potential of using smart door locks in unattended home delivery of goods, and at home services (unattended and attended) by producing new knowledge on Potential adopters and Non-adopters. Survey data on Potential adopters and Non-adopters were statistically analysed to identify their 1) characteristics (sociodemographic, interpersonal trust and technological literacy), 2) stated demand for unattended home delivery of goods and 3) attitudes regarding in-home services using smart door-locks. Results suggest that potential users are resourceful and more sociable than non-adopters. Furthermore, they have a higher problem perception. Potential adopters are more positive to let in cleaners, craftsmen, healthcare personnel, service personnel, in-fridge delivery services and pet sitters into their home unattended using smart door locks. Regarding goods, they are more positive towards delivery of sports equipment and furniture and appliances. Due to the differentiated needs of Potential adopters and Non-adopters, we propose a typology based on three dimensions ( Technological trust, Social trust and Life management needs ). Increased understanding of potential users’ delivery preferences can be used in the smart door lock market development. The proposed typology can e.g. be used in the upscaling of smart door locks for home delivery of goods and services by diversifying strategies to meet varying adopter needs. A successful unattended delivery system behind closed door can reduce the number of failed deliveries, porch piracy, and unnecessary trips to let in service providers, and might enhance perceived flexibility and convenience of consumers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it