MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Age Groups and Civic Subdivisions

2024· book-chapter· en· W4405541884 on OpenAlexaff
Nigel M. Kennell

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubdivisionGeographySocioeconomicsPolitical scienceSociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter surveys the major civic divisions in the Greek cities of the Roman Empire. It traces the Hellenistic origins and Imperial-period developments of the constituent grades of the citizen training systems (paides, ephēboi, neoi), as well the corporate groupings of older citizens (presbuteroi, gerousiai) that appeared shortly before the Imperial period and became predominant in later centuries. The roles of the officials and staff involved in citizen training are examined, together with elements of the curriculum. The relationship between the presbuteroi and gerousiai is likewise discussed, along with their powers and functions. The overview concludes with an account of the oldest and most enduring civic divisions, the originally fictive kinship groups known as phylai and their subdivisions in various cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicRural development and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207