MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405552516 · doi:10.25198/2077-7175-2024-6-89

FEATURES OF THE FUNCTIONING OF ROADSIDE PARKING SPACE

2024· article· en· W4405552516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellect Innovations Investments · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Systems and Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringOccupancyParking spaceSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceParking guidance and informationQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyEnvironmental scienceCivil engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the study is to investigate the natural quantitative characteristics of the functioning of a roadside (linear) parking area: the number of parking sessions, the occupancy of the parking space, the distribution of storage periods, the intensity of entry and exit of cars, the turnover of parking spaces, etc. The object of the study is the processes of functioning of a roadside parking lot located near an educational institution (school). The subject of the study is the features of the functioning of a parking space of this type. In contrast to well-known publications, the evolution of key indicators of roadside parking is considered, that is, their dependence on the time (quarter) of the year. Observations were carried out continuously for a week both in spring (April) and summer (July), autumn (October) and winter (February). The data for the study were obtained using the stationary measuring software and hardware complex «Azimuth DT», which monitors the movement of vehicles in the parking area continuously throughout the entire observation period. Digital processing of video recording data of cars entering and leaving the parking lot allowed us to establish that almost all the determined quantitative characteristics of the parking space are not constant and depend on the season, which must be taken into account when placing, planning and organizing the functioning of the parking area. It is noted that the specific generation of correspondence and the required number of parking spaces near the centers of mass gravity are sensitive to the characteristics of the urban area and, apparently, vary greatly across the regions of the country. The indicators obtained for urbanized areas of other countries are unique and are not applicable for practical use in Russia. It is advisable to extend the experience and methodology of studying the parking space to the study of the performance indicators of flat, including intercepting, and multi-level parking lots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it