MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405552516 · doi:10.25198/2077-7175-2024-6-89

FEATURES OF THE FUNCTIONING OF ROADSIDE PARKING SPACE

2024· article· en· W4405552516 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Igor A. Belyaev, A. M. Maksimov

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellect Innovations Investments · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Systems and Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringOccupancyParking spaceSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceParking guidance and informationQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyEnvironmental scienceCivil engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the study is to investigate the natural quantitative characteristics of the functioning of a roadside (linear) parking area: the number of parking sessions, the occupancy of the parking space, the distribution of storage periods, the intensity of entry and exit of cars, the turnover of parking spaces, etc. The object of the study is the processes of functioning of a roadside parking lot located near an educational institution (school). The subject of the study is the features of the functioning of a parking space of this type. In contrast to well-known publications, the evolution of key indicators of roadside parking is considered, that is, their dependence on the time (quarter) of the year. Observations were carried out continuously for a week both in spring (April) and summer (July), autumn (October) and winter (February). The data for the study were obtained using the stationary measuring software and hardware complex «Azimuth DT», which monitors the movement of vehicles in the parking area continuously throughout the entire observation period. Digital processing of video recording data of cars entering and leaving the parking lot allowed us to establish that almost all the determined quantitative characteristics of the parking space are not constant and depend on the season, which must be taken into account when placing, planning and organizing the functioning of the parking area. It is noted that the specific generation of correspondence and the required number of parking spaces near the centers of mass gravity are sensitive to the characteristics of the urban area and, apparently, vary greatly across the regions of the country. The indicators obtained for urbanized areas of other countries are unique and are not applicable for practical use in Russia. It is advisable to extend the experience and methodology of studying the parking space to the study of the performance indicators of flat, including intercepting, and multi-level parking lots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellect Innovations InvestmentsSame topicTransportation Systems and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207