Outcomes of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens in patients with well-controlled glaucoma and ocular hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To assess visual outcomes and satisfaction of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) in individuals with ocular hypertension (OHT) and well-controlled mild glaucoma undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS: An investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, interventional, noncomparative study conducted in Montreal, Canada. The study enrolled 31 patients (55 eyes) with OHT or mild glaucoma who received a non-diffractive EDOF IOL (Acrysof IQ Vivity). Participants underwent sequential cataract surgery with the Vivity IOL. Follow-up evaluations occurred at 1d, 1, and 3mo postoperatively, assessing uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity. Questionnaires (QUVID: Questionnaire for visual disturbances and IOLSAT: Intraocular lens satisfaction) were administered pre and post-operatively to measure visual disturbances and spectacle independence in various lighting. Safety parameters included intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medications, spherical equivalence, mean deviation and pattern standard deviation or square root of lost variance on Octopus visual field. RESULTS: At 1 and 3mo postoperatively, significant improvements were observed in uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuity. Spectacle independence was enhanced for distance and intermediate vision, especially in bright light settings. Spectacle-free intermediate vision was improved even in dim lighting. Visual disturbances, particularly glare symptoms, were reduced, and there was a notable decrease in IOP and glaucoma medication burden at 3mo. There was more hazy vision postoperatively with no impact on visual acuity and visual satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The non-diffractive EDOF lens improves distance and intermediate spectacle-free visual function in patients with OHT and well-controlled glaucoma. The findings highlight significant improvements in visual acuity, reduced glare, enhanced spectacle independence, and improved visual performance in different lighting conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".