MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405558522 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25573

Reliable modelling of the sulphur properties to calculate the process parameters of the Claus sulphur recovery plant

2024· article· en· W4405558522 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooToronto Metropolitan UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClaus processSulfurProcess (computing)Process engineeringEnvironmental scienceMineralogyChemistryComputer scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgyEngineeringHydrogen sulfide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In order to handle the overwhelming effects of the removed hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) from natural gas and industrial waste gases on the environment, H 2 S can be converted to elemental sulphur. Among the available processes for sulphur recovery, the most widely employed process is a modified Claus process. In this work, first, least square version of support vector machine (LS‐SVM) approach is utilized for determining the properties of sulphur including heat of vaporization, heat of condensation ( S 6 , S 8 ), heat of dissociation ( S 6 , S 8 ), and heat capacity of equilibrium sulphur vapours as a function of temperature. An illustrative example is given to show the usefulness of the presented computer‐based models with two parameters for designing and operation of the Claus sulphur recovery unit (SRU). According to the error analysis results, predicted values by the proposed intelligent models are in excellent agreement with the reported data in the literature for the aforementioned sulphur properties where the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) is higher than 0.99 for all developed models. The average absolute relative deviation percent (%AARD) is less than 1.3 while predicting the heat capacity of equilibrium sulphur vapours. Other proposed models' predictions show less than 0.2% AARD from the target values. In addition, a mathematical algorithm on the basis of the Leverage approach is proposed to define the domain of applicability of the developed LS‐SVM models. It was found that the presented models are statistically valid and the employed data points for developing the models are within the range of their applicability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it