Effective connectivity of default mode network subsystems and automatic smoking behaviour among males
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The default mode network (DMN) is not a single system, but rather is composed of smaller and distinct functional subsystems that interact with each other. The functional relevance of these subsystems in tobacco use disorder (TUD) and the neurobiological features associated with smoking motivation are still unclear; thus, we sought to assess causal or direct connectivity alterations within 3 subsystems of the DMN among people with TUD. METHODS: We recruited male smokers and nonsmokers. We conducted resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and collected ratings on smoking-related clinical scales. We applied dynamic causal modelling (DCM) to rs-fMRI to characterize changes of effective connectivity in TUD from 3 DMN subsystems, including the midline core network (i.e., the posterior cingulate cortex and the anterior medial prefrontal cortex [PCC-aMPFC] core DMN), the medial temporal subsystem (MTL-DMN), and the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex subsystem (dMPFC-DMN). We used leave-one-out cross-validation to investigate whether the neural response could predict smoking reasons, evaluated using the Russell Reason for Smoking Questionnaire). RESULTS: We recruited 88 smokers and 54 nonsmokers. Among people with TUD, the parahippocampal cortex (PHC) region showed enhanced self-connection, which was associated with the severity of TUD after nighttime withdrawal. Compared with nonsmokers, people with TUD displayed significant increased effective connectivity within the dMPFC-DMN, and decreased effective connectivity from the dMPFC-DMN to the PCC-aMPFC core DMN. Moreover, decreased effective connectivity from the lateral temporal cortex to the dMPFC could predict the smoking reason related to automatic behaviour. LIMITATIONS: Although we found aberrance in causal connections in DMN subsystems among people with TUD, our cross-sectional study could not be used to investigate changes in effective connectivity over time and their relationship with clinical features. CONCLUSION: This study emphasized the aberrant causal connections of different functional subsystems of the DMN in TUD and revealed the neural correlates of automatic smoking behaviours. These findings suggested DMN subsystem-derived indicators could be a potential biomarker for TUD and could be used to identify the heterogeneity in motivation for smoking behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".