When They Appeared Falcon Lake 1967: The inside story of a close encounter Stan Michalak & Chris Rutkowski Plus the original story My Encounter With The UFO By Stephen Michalak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The incident at Manitoba’s Falcon Lake in 1967 has been reported on repeatedly. Thoroughly researched by multiple sources and agencies, there is little doubt that the authenticated physical effects are sufficiently convincing to conclude a serious encounter with UFOs did occur. Those who collect UFO reports and want details about this incident may find this book of interest.\n\nInitially this was a single witness case. On 20 May of that year, Stephan Michalak, a Polish immigrant to Canada and part-time prospector was collecting samples in a relatively remote area when the incident happened. The fundamentals are that he reported seeing two UFOs in close proximity. When one landed, his thoughts were that these craft were experimental and of American origin. He reported hearing voices and addressing them in several languages, but to no avail. Among the immediate effects indicated was a feeling of “wafts of warm air that seemed to come out in waves from the craft, accompanied by the pungent odour of sulphur.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".