MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405568895 · doi:10.1080/01419870.2024.2441907

When citizenship is off the table: the comfortable transience of high-skilled Indian women migrants in the UAE

2024· article· en· W4405568895 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anju Mary Paul, Githmi Rabel

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnic and Racial Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational University of SingaporeYork UniversityNew York University Abu Dhabi
KeywordsCitizenshipTable (database)Gender studiesSociologyDemographic economicsPolitical scienceLawEconomicsComputer sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Not all high-income countries offer citizenship pathways to high-skilled migrants. The United Arab Emirates (UAE), with its large skilled migrant population but practically impossible naturalization pathways, is therefore worth examining. Through in-depth interviews with 31 college-educated Indian women in the UAE, we find that the UAE’s geographical proximity to India, cultural similarity, zero taxes, and high standard of living, made interviewees reluctant to leave for the West or return to India. Instead, interviewees chose to stretch their time in the UAE and delay departure, even though this meant remaining in a state of “comfortable transience”. They did so because they worried about being unable to re-adjust to life in India, and also the possibility of downward class mobility, the loss of cheap domestic help, and racial discrimination in Western countries. For these migrants, comfortable transience in the UAE was more appealing than “uncomfortable permanence” at home or in the West.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnic and Racial StudiesSame topicMigration and Labor DynamicsFrench-language works237,207