Reseña de Rockwell, G., & Passarotti, M. (2019). The Index Thomisticus as a Big Data Project. Umanistica Digitale, 3(5).
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo reseñado recoge el trabajo de los profesores Geoffrey Rockwell (University of Alberta, Canadá) y Marco Passarotti (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italia) sobre el proyecto del Index Thomisticus (IT), el cual inició el sacerdote jesuita Roberto Busa (1913-2011) a comienzos de la década de 1950. El IT surge como una herramienta para realizar búsqueda lematizadas dentro de la obra completa de Santo Tomás de Aquino. El objetivo que perseguía Busa era lograr un método que permitiera registrar, identificar, recuperar y procesar de manera automática y replicable todas las ocurrencias de las 11 millones de palabras que componen la obra de Santo Tomás de Aquino.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.058 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it