MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405570925 · doi:10.1128/aac.01238-24

SARS-CoV-2 resistance analyses from the Phase 3 PINETREE study of remdesivir treatment in nonhospitalized participants

2024· article· en· W4405570925 on OpenAlexaff
Hery W. Lee, Jiani Li, Ross Martin, Dong Han, Simin Xu, Jasmine Moshiri, Nadine Peinovich, Grégory Camus, Jason K. Perry, R. Hyland, Danielle Porter, Mazin Abdelghany, Matthias Götte, Charlotte Hedskog

Bibliographic record

VenueAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersGilead Sciences
KeywordsRepliconRNASubgenomic mRNAVirologyBiologyCoronavirusViral replicationViral loadCoronaviridaeVirusCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeneticsMedicineGenomeGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Remdesivir inhibits the SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp; Nsp12). Here, we conducted viral resistance analyses from the Phase 3 PINETREE trial of remdesivir in nonhospitalized participants at risk of severe COVID-19. Nasopharyngeal swabs (collected at baseline [Day 1], Days 2, 3, 7, and 14) were eligible for analysis if their viral load was above the lower limit of quantification for the RT-qPCR assay (2228 copies/mL). The SARS-CoV-2 genome was sequenced for all remdesivir participants and 50% of placebo participants (baseline, Days 3, 7, and 14) and for participants who progressed to COVID-19-related hospitalization or all-cause death (all time points). Emergent substitutions in Nsp12 and other replication complex proteins were phenotyped using site-directed mutagenesis in a SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic replicon system. Overall, emergent Nsp12 substitutions were detected in 8/115 (7.0%) remdesivir participants and 7/129 (5.4%) placebo participants (1 substitution overlap between groups). Based on a structural analysis, none of the emergent Nsp12 substitutions were in direct contact with the incoming nucleoside triphosphate substrate, the RNA, or the RNA template 5′ overhang. One substitution (A376V) showed reduced susceptibility to remdesivir (12.6-fold change in remdesivir half-maximal concentration [EC 50 ]); it also showed reduced fitness when introduced in the SARS-CoV-2 replicon and virus in vitro . Other substitutions had <1.1-fold change in remdesivir EC 50 . None of the emergent substitutions in Nsp8, Nsp10, Nsp13, or Nsp14 (remdesivir, 10/115 [8.7%]; placebo, 10/129 [7.8%]) showed reduced remdesivir susceptibility. In conclusion, emergent substitutions in the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp complex with reduced remdesivir susceptibility were uncommon, indicating a high barrier to remdesivir resistance. CLINICAL TRIALS This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04501952 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→