MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405571459 · doi:10.21248/riss.2024.100.28

Es gibt weder Gewähr noch Geschlechtsverkehr

2024· article· de· W4405571459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRISS – zeitschrift für psychoanalyse · 2024
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychoanalysis and Social Critique
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erkundet wird die Möglichkeit von Gewähr. Die psychoanalytischen Praxis als Kur wie in ihrer Organisation berührt dabei auch die Ontologie. Gewähr hat eine Prozessdynamik, die das Verhältnis zwischen Individuen, zwischen Psyche und Körper, sowie zwischen Theorie und Praxis in der Psychoanalyse reflektiert. Gewähr entsteht als kollektive Interaktion und Reflexion in Übertragung und verändert das Kollektiv. Durch die Betrachtung von Gewähr als einen aktiven Prozess des Gebens und Nehmens werden Fragen der Macht, Ethik und Erkenntnis aufgeworfen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it