MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405580392 · doi:10.7554/elife.98514.2.sa2

Reviewer #2 (Public review): Nutritional state-dependent modulation of Insulin-Producing Cells in Drosophila

2024· peer-review· en· W4405580392 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilJulius-Maximilians-Universität WürzburgCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversidad del AtlánticoUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityFlorida Atlantic UniversityUniversity of MissouriUniversité de BordeauxDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUK Research and InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDrosophila (subgenus)InsulinModulation (music)State (computer science)Cell biologyBiologyEndocrinologyGeneticsComputer scienceGeneArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insulin plays a key role in metabolic homeostasis across vertebrate and invertebrate species. Drosophila Insulin-Producing Cells (IPCs) are functional analogues to mammalian pancreatic beta cells and release insulin directly into circulation. IPC activity is modulated by nutrient availability, circadian time, and the behavioral state. To investigate the in vivo dynamics of IPC activity in the context of metabolic homeostasis, we quantified effects of nutritional and internal state changes on IPCs using electrophysiological recordings. We found that the nutritional state strongly modulates IPC activity. IPCs became less active with increasing periods of starvation. Refeeding starved flies with glucose or fructose, two nutritive sugars, significantly increased IPC activity, whereas non-nutritive sugar and protein had no effect. In contrast to feeding, glucose perfusion did not affect IPC activity. This was reminiscent of the mammalian incretin effect, in which ingestion of glucose drives higher insulin release than intravenous glucose application. Contrary to IPCs, Diuretic hormone 44-expressing neurons in the pars intercerebralis (DH44PINs), which are anatomically similar to IPCs, responded to glucose perfusion. Functional connectivity experiments demonstrated that glucose-sensing DH44PINs do not affect IPC activity, while other DH44Ns inhibit IPCs. This suggests that populations of autonomously and systemically sugar-sensing neurons work in parallel to maintain metabolic homeostasis. Ultimately, metabolic state changes affect behavior. For example, hungry flies increase their locomotor activity in search of food. In support of this idea, activating IPCs had a small, satiety-like effect on starved flies, resulting in reduced walking activity, whereas activating DH44Ns strongly increased walking activity. Taken together, we show that IPCs and DH44Ns are an integral part of a sophisticated modulatory network that orchestrates glucose homeostasis and adaptive behavior in response to shifts in the metabolic state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.086
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.086
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0220.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms→French-language works237,207→