MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405580460 · doi:10.1007/s11104-024-07116-5

Interactive effects of crop types and nitrogen sources on N2O emissions in a cool humid climate

2024· article· en· W4405580460 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Joannie D’Amours, David E. Pelster, Martin H. Chantigny, Andrew VanderZaag, E. Smith, Gilles Bélanger, Émilie Maillard, Marie-Élise Samson, E. G. Gregorich, Denis A. Angers, Isabelle Royer, Marie‐Noëlle Thivierge

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant and Soil · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité Laval
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceNitrogenPlant physiologyCropAtmospheric sciencesClimate changeAgronomyEcologyChemistryBiologyBotanyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Perennial forages in rotation with annual crops can improve agricultural resilience by increasing soil organic carbon. However, how nitrogen (N) sources interact with rotation diversity to influence soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions is not well understood. Methods During three snow-free seasons, N 2 O emissions, crop yields, and ancillary variables were measured at three experimental sites with contrasting soil textures (silty clay and sandy loam) in eastern Canada. Using a split-plot design, we compared a corn ( Zea mays L.)-soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merr.)-corn rotation and a mixed perennial grass sward receiving N via: i) mineral fertilizer (MIN), ii) liquid dairy manure (LDM), and iii) inclusion of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) to the perennial forages with no additional N (LEG). Results When summed across sites over all three years, cumulative N 2 O emissions were greater for LDM than MIN in annual crops (8.75 ± 1.63 and 5.15 ± 0.96 kg N 2 O-N ha –1 , respectively), but not in perennial grasses (2.95 ± 0.55 and 3.76 ± 0.70 kg N 2 O-N ha –1 , respectively). When comparing N sources within each crop type over the three years, MIN generated greater yields than LDM in annual and perennial crops, but lower yield-scaled N 2 O emissions than LDM in annual crops only. During forages post-seeding years, area- and yield-scaled N 2 O emissions induced by LDM and LEG were lower than MIN. Conclusion Our results suggest that for a cool humid climate using LDM or LEG in perennial forages and MIN on annual crops can reduce overall N 2 O emissions, while generating similar or lower yield-scaled emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant and SoilSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207