MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405592103 · doi:10.1051/ita/2024015

Enumerating Minimum Feedback Vertex Sets in directed graphs with union-cat trees

2024· article· en· W4405592103 on OpenAlex
Moussa Abdenbi, Alexandre Blondin Massé, A Goupil, Mélodie Lapointe, Martin Lavoie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRAIRO. Theoretical informatics and applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsVertex (graph theory)CombinatoricsFeedback vertex setMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsGraphComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of finding a minimum feedback vertex set (MFVS) in a directed graph has been known to be NP-hard for around 40 years: It is one of the problems listed in Karp’s famous 1972 paper. Several strategies to solve the MFVS problem, both exact and approximate, have been proposed. In particular, in 2000, Lin and Jou presented an exact algorithm based on eight graph contraction operators whose complexity is polynomial for a particular class of graphs called DOME-contractible graphs. This paper proposes two contributions. First, we introduce a data structure called union-cat tree that provides, in some cases, a compact representation of a family of constant size subsets of a given finite set. Secondly, we extend Lin and Jou’s algorithm to compute the set of all MFVSs of any directed graph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it