MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405592901 · doi:10.1139/dsa-2023-0119

Noninvasive archaeological site characterization: case studies from Fort Ellice 1 and 2, Canada

2024· article· en· W4405592901 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Scott Hamilton, Nick Kuncewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueDrone Systems and Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growing availability of remotely sensed aerial data, noninvasive archaeological prospection and characterization have become increasingly viable. While such approaches are comparatively well-developed at sites with prominent remnant structures, their utility is less clear when surface and subsurface features are only subtly indicated. This case study addresses the utility of aerial remote sensing using two western Canadian fur trade posts with only modest surface evidence. We consider public domain imagery at diverse resolutions and compare it with output from unmanned aerial vehicles, and also the integration of such data with archival imagery to aid in interpretation of archaeological features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrone Systems and ApplicationsSame topicArchaeological Research and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207