The Relationship Between Radiological and Ultrasonographic Changes and Balance Disorders in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the link between radiological and ultrasonographic changes and balance disorders in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods: Clinically and radiologically diagnosed 97 patients with knee OA, 33 age and sex matched healthy volunteers were included in the study. Balance was analyzed utilizing the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Kellgren Lawrence (KL) scale was used for radiographic staging of knee OA. Mean Femoral cartilage (FC), quadriceps femoris muscle thickness (QFMT), thigh subcutaneous fat thickness (TSFT), QFMT/TSFT, QF tendon, proximal and distal patellar tendon thickness were evaluated using ultrasonography. The functional level and pain severity of the patients was determined by Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: In individuals with knee OA BBS scores were discovered to be lower and TUG scores were higher (p
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".