Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected myocarditis from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy – A real-world observational study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and aims: Cardiotoxicity from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is a challenge in clinical practice, and the assessment of ICI-related myocarditis (ICI-M) is often complicated by a variable phenotype. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is used frequently, but evidence is poor. Here, we aim to assess the role of CMR in the assessment of suspected ICI-M in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: All patients receiving CMR at our centre for suspected ICI-M between September 2019 and January 2024 were included and retrospectively analysed. CMR parameters were correlated with clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters and stratified for presence of myocarditis as per final diagnosis. Results: A total of 55 patients who received CMR for suspected ICI-M were analysed, including 25 patients with ICI-M and 30 patients with non-myocarditis cardiotoxicity (non-M). The mean age (ICI-M versus (vs.) non-M) was 65.7 ± 13.6 vs. 67.3 ± 9.9 (p = 0.61) years, 32.0 % vs. 26.7 % (p = 0.67) were female, and 40.0 % vs. 26.7 % (p = 0.29) had pre-existing coronary heart disease. Cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic data did not differ between the groups. In CMR analysis, presence of LGE was associated with ICI-M (56.0 % in ICI-M vs. 26.7 % in non-M, p = 0.03). Myocardial oedema was generally rare and not associated with ICI-M. Conclusion: In this real-life assessment of routine clinical practice, the diagnostic assessment of ICI-M is challenged by low sensitivity of common diagnostic measures, often requiring a multimodal approach. Presence of LGE in CMR is associated with ICI-M, but sensitivity and specificity are low. Prospective data to improve diagnostic criteria is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it